FDA Publishes Updated Guidance on Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published an updated guidance titled “Pyrogen and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers (Edition 2)” (March 2026).

The document provides nonbinding recommendations reflecting the FDA’s current thinking on endotoxin and pyrogen testing for drugs, biological products, and medical devices.

Scope of the Guidance

The guidance is intended to address specific topics not fully covered in existing standards and compendial chapters, including:

  • USP <85> Bacterial Endotoxins Test

  • USP <161> Medical Devices – Bacterial Endotoxin and Pyrogen Tests

  • AAMI ST72: Bacterial Endotoxins—Test Methodologies

It does not replace these standards but provides additional clarification on regulatory expectations.

Key Clarifications

Sampling for In-Process and Finished Product Testing

The FDA states that sampling must be:

  • Scientifically sound and appropriate

  • Based on manufacturing process understanding

  • Consider factors such as:

    • Raw materials

    • In-process materials

    • Manufacturing design

    • Endotoxin removal steps

Sampling approaches should be adjusted over time as process knowledge increases and should be reflected in regulatory submissions where applicable.

Retesting and Out-of-Specification Results

The guidance refers to USP <85> for retesting principles:

  • Retesting is acceptable under defined conditions (e.g., dilution below MVD)

  • If an OOS result occurs at MVD and is not attributable to error, the batch should be rejected

All procedures must be predefined in approved SOPs.

Sample Storage and Handling

The FDA confirms that:

  • Endotoxin detection may be affected by storage and handling conditions

  • Manufacturers should establish procedures supported by stability data

This includes consideration of endotoxin source and behaviour in testing.

Use of Composite (Pooled) Samples

Pooling of samples is permitted under certain conditions:

  • For drug products:

    • Typically applicable to small-volume parenterals

    • Requires adjustment of the Maximum Valid Dilution (MVD)

    • FDA recommends pooling no more than three units

  • For medical devices:

    • Pooling should follow extraction approaches aligned with:

      • ISO 10993-11

      • ISO 10993-12

Certain product types (e.g., suspensions) may not be suitable for pooling.

Use of Alternative Test Methods

Alternative methods may be used if they:

  • Provide advantages (e.g., sensitivity, precision)

  • Are validated according to USP <1225>

  • Demonstrate equivalent or better performance

In case of dispute, the USP compendial method remains the reference.

Transition Between Test Methods

When changing endotoxin test methods:

  • Comparability between methods must be demonstrated

  • Validation should include:

    • Detection limits

    • Inhibition/enhancement testing

    • Performance on product samples

Regulatory submissions may be required depending on product type (e.g., supplements, 30-day notices).

Endotoxin Limits

The FDA states that:

  • The 1987 guidance endotoxin limit table is no longer applicable

  • Limits should be established using:

    • USP <85>

    • AAMI standards

Limits must reflect current dosage and product characteristics.

Quality by Design (QbD) Considerations

The guidance indicates that endotoxin control strategies may be based on:

  • Product and process understanding

  • Risk management approaches

  • Use of in-process testing and monitoring

Endotoxin limits should be justified case-by-case.

Medical Device-Specific Expectations

For medical devices, endotoxin limits depend on intended use and contact type:

  • 0.5 EU/mL or 20 EU/device
    (devices contacting cardiovascular or lymphatic systems)

  • 0.06 EU/mL or 2.15 EU/device
    (devices contacting cerebrospinal fluid)

Testing should follow USP <161> and applicable ISO 10993 standards.

Relevance for Manufacturers

This updated guidance provides clarification on:

  • Sampling strategies

  • Acceptance criteria and retesting

  • Method validation and transitions

  • Establishment of endotoxin limits

Manufacturers placing products on the U.S. market should ensure that their testing approaches and documentation are aligned with these expectations, in addition to applicable compendial and regulatory requirements.

Read the full document below.

Anterior
Anterior

European Reference Networks Continue to Expand: What It Means for Medical Device Manufacturers

Próximo
Próximo

FDA Issues Final Guidance on Medical Devices with Indications Associated with Weight Loss