MHRA Publishes Updated Guide on Defective Medicinal Products

In February 2026, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) published a new edition of “A Guide to Defective Medicinal Products”, providing updated guidance for patients, healthcare professionals, manufacturers, distributors and licence holders on the reporting, investigation and recall of suspected defective medicinal products .

Although primarily focused on medicinal products, the guidance is highly relevant for manufacturers and licence holders operating in the UK market, particularly those responsible for complaint handling, quality defect investigations and recall management.

Scope of the Guidance

The guide applies to:

  • All medicinal products for human use, including licensed and unlicensed products (such as specials and imported unlicensed medicines)

  • Substances used in their manufacture or packaging

It does not apply to:

  • Medical devices

  • Veterinary medicinal products

  • Suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs)

  • Medication errors or near-miss incidents

The document clearly differentiates between:

  • Quality defects

  • Adverse drug reactions

  • User errors

  • Incidents involving medical devices

This distinction is critical for manufacturers when classifying complaints and determining reporting pathways.

The Role of the Defective Medicines Report Centre (DMRC)

The Defective Medicines Report Centre (DMRC), part of the MHRA, is responsible for:

  • Receiving and assessing reports of suspected defective medicinal products

  • Advising and monitoring actions taken by the responsible licence holder

  • Communicating recall information when necessary

The DMRC operates during business hours with emergency out-of-hours contact procedures. Where recalls are required, decisions are taken in consultation with the relevant licence holder.

Importantly, the responsibility for carrying out a recall remains with the licence holder.

Statutory Obligations for Manufacturers

The guidance reiterates key legal obligations under:

  • The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1916)

  • Directive 2003/94/EC (GMP Directive)

  • EU and UK Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements

Manufacturers must:

  • Implement systems for recording and reviewing complaints

  • Maintain an effective recall system

  • Investigate all complaints concerning quality defects

  • Immediately inform the licensing authority of any defect that could result in a recall

  • Ensure compliance with Good Distribution Practice (GDP) when distributing products

Notably, the guide states that manufacturers who notify the MHRA only after a recall has already commenced are in breach of the regulations.

Where uncertainty exists as to whether a recall is required, the guidance instructs manufacturers to contact the DMRC for advice.

Recall Classification System

The MHRA uses an internationally agreed classification system:

  • Class 1 (National Patient Safety Alert – NatPSA)
    Risk of death or serious disability

  • Class 2
    Risk of mistreatment or harm (non-life-threatening)

  • Class 3
    Unlikely to cause harm (e.g. specification non-compliance)

  • Class 4 (Caution in Use)
    Minor defects not likely to impair product efficacy

All Class 1 recalls are issued as National Patient Safety Alerts (NatPSA) and published via the Central Alerting System (CAS).

For manufacturers, this means recall strategy must consider:

  • Risk classification

  • Level of recall (wholesale, pharmacy, or patient level)

  • Whether an MHRA Recall Notification will support the action

  • Potential need for Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs)

New Digital Reporting Requirements for Licence Holders

Appendix 7 introduces detailed guidance on the online Defective Medicines Reporting Form, which must be used by licence holders via the MHRA ICSR submissions portal .

The reporting system:

  • Is aligned with the E2B R3 ICSR structure

  • Uses MedDRA terminology for defect classification

  • Requires structured data entry including:

    • Impact assessment

    • Risk evaluation

    • Proposed market action

    • Root cause analysis

    • CAPA information

In urgent cases (critical or major defects), telephone notification remains mandatory.

For manufacturers, this increases expectations around:

  • Documentation quality

  • Timeliness of reporting

  • Traceability of batches

  • Robust risk assessments

Follow-Up and Closure Requirements

Investigations remain open until the DMRC issues a formal closing response.

Licence holders must:

  • Provide regular updates

  • Submit a final report (normally within 12 weeks unless otherwise agreed)

  • Provide reconciliation data for recalled stock

  • Agree timelines with the DMRC where extensions are required

The guidance also confirms that information relating to reported defects feeds into the MHRA’s Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) process.

What This Means for Manufacturers

For UK marketing authorisation holders and manufacturers, this updated guidance reinforces:

  • Immediate reporting obligations

  • Clear recall governance

  • Structured digital submission requirements

  • Formalised risk classification criteria

  • Regulatory scrutiny of complaint handling systems

  • Integration of defect investigations into GMP inspection oversight

Manufacturers should ensure that:

  • Their quality systems clearly differentiate ADRs, errors and quality defects

  • Recall procedures are aligned with MHRA classification criteria

  • Staff are trained on DMRC reporting pathways

  • Digital reporting capabilities are fully operational

  • Risk assessments are defensible and well documented

Final Remarks

The February 2026 update consolidates the MHRA’s expectations for the management of defective medicinal products in the UK and reinforces the central role of licence holders in safeguarding patients through robust complaint handling, investigation and recall systems .

Manufacturers supplying the UK market should review the full guidance and assess alignment with their existing quality and pharmacovigilance frameworks.

Read the full document below.

Anterior
Anterior

European Commission Publishes Updated Harmonised Standards Under MDR

Próximo
Próximo

ANVISA Publishes Draft Normative Instruction on UDI Data Transmission and SIUD Management