EU Borderline & Classification Manual (Version 5 – April 2026): What Manufacturers Need to Know

The Version 5 (April 2026) of the Manual on Borderline and Classification for Medical Devices under Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) has been made available, reflecting agreements from Member State authorities within the Borderline and Classification Working Group (BCWG).

Nature and role of the Manual

The Manual compiles agreed positions from competent authorities on borderline and classification cases. It is intended to support the case-by-case application of MDR and IVDR.

However, it is important to note:

  • The Manual is not legally binding

  • It does not represent the official position of the European Commission

  • Final decisions remain with national competent authorities and courts

  • Only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide authoritative interpretation of EU law

Scope of the document

The Manual addresses:

  • Qualification (borderline): whether a product is a medical device, an IVD, or falls outside the scope

  • Classification: application of MDR and IVDR classification rules where difficulties arise

It also confirms that qualification is primarily governed by:

  • MDR Article 4 and IVDR Article 3

  • Definitions and exclusions under Article 1 of both Regulations

Examples relevant for manufacturers

The Manual includes practical cases illustrating how authorities interpret borderline and classification questions.

Products not considered medical devices

Several examples confirm that products are outside the scope of MDR where the principal mode of action is not compatible with the definition of a medical device:

  • A nasal spray with antibodies for COVID-19, where the principal action is immunological

  • A dual-action cream with menthol and capsaicin, where the effect is pharmacological

  • Lactose vaginal tablets, where the principal action is metabolic

Substance-based devices and classification

The Manual provides examples where devices incorporating substances may fall under higher classification rules:

  • Root canal irrigation solutions (NaOCl or CHX)

    • May qualify as medical devices only if a mechanical mode of action is demonstrated

    • Otherwise, due to antimicrobial effects, they should be classified as Class III under Rule 14, unless robust scientific evidence demonstrates no ancillary effect

  • Additive solutions containing adenine for red blood cell processing

    • Classified as Class III under Rule 14, as adenine is considered a medicinal substance with ancillary action

Classification examples

The Manual also clarifies classification in specific cases:

  • Saline solutions for nasal irrigationClass IIa (Rule 21)

  • Medical calculator software → qualifies as a medical device, classified at least Class IIa under Rule 11, depending on the significance of the information provided

Products outside MDR due to lack of medical purpose or direct action

Some products are not considered medical devices because they do not meet the definition under Article 2(1) MDR:

  • Systems intended only to prepare medicinal products

  • Products intended to protect healthcare professionals only

  • Tools used for counting or workflow control without a direct medical purpose

Key considerations for manufacturers

Based on the cases included in the Manual:

  • Qualification must be carefully assessed before classification

  • The principal mode of action is critical to determine whether a product falls under MDR

  • Scientific evidence is essential, particularly for products involving substances

  • Claims alone are not sufficient to establish qualification or classification

Relationship with other guidance

The Manual should be read together with relevant MDCG guidance, including:

  • MDCG 2022-5 – Borderline between medical devices and medicinal products

  • MDCG 2019-11 – Qualification and classification of software

  • MDCG 2021-24 – Classification rules under MDR

This update provides additional examples that may support manufacturers in assessing borderline situations and classification under MDR and IVDR, while confirming that regulatory decisions remain case-specific and at national level.

Read the full document below.

Anterior
Anterior

EU Defines Conditions for Delaying Cybersecurity Notifications under the Cyber Resilience Act

Próximo
Próximo

MHRA Updates Guidance on Clinical Investigations and Introduces 2026–2027 Fee Waiver Pilot